|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
You people really think you have no faith? |
|
|
|
|
Replies: 38 Last Post July 22 4:15am by amanitta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post from this position was omitted due to content violations
|
amazingness99
Wealthy Hobo
Patron
|
What's Schrodinger's cat?
------- Fangalicious. sosupkthnx is my LW boyfriend :)
|
|
|
Alabamarama
Wealthy Hobo
Sustainer
Support Leader
|
I have faith
------- Sexual innuendo.
|
|
|
LaMotta
Soothsayer
Sustainer
|
I have faith
------- I am the Zodiac!
|
|
|
dragonking
Vanguard of Socialism
Patron
|
What is that?
------- Dragonking: LW's Own Superhero! RIP MOM 5-30-07 :'(
|
|
|
JulieisWHOA
Advisor
|
I don't get it. hm Too lazy to read Wiki.
------- ~*~T&J Forever~*~
|
|
|
( TheLastMagister )
Professional
|
The theory is if you put a cat in a box, then put poison in a vial in the box, seal it, then use a change of pressure in the box to break the vial, you are therefore assuming that A) The cat is in the box B) The vial is in the box C) The poison is in the box D) The pressure broke the vial E) The cat has been killed by the poison And assuming is faith. Therefore you have put faith into five different things already that you cannot see, hear, touch, smell, feel, or in any way acknowledge their existence. Post edited at 4:03 pm on July 19, 2008 by TheLastMagister
------- Moderation-LiveWire's 3rd Reich.
|
|
|
The User Abuser
Novice
|
I can't comprehend what's being said.
------- It doesn't matter what you've done to me. All that matters is I'm still standing.
|
|
|
Forever Angel
Sweet Dreams
Sustainer
|
Everyone has some kind of faith. It's just that in the context of this forum (religion) people associate 'faith' with a belief in some deity or higher power.
------- "God does not play dice" - Albert Einstein "God does play dice" - Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
person192
Dairy Product Addict
|
We have to have faith anyway. If you're going to be like THAT, then we need faith to that this is real, rather than a figment of our imaginations, so we do have to have some sort of faith, but that's really not the same as having faith in god or anything like than, because there's so much evidence that contradicts that idea that it would be safe to assume that that's just a load of rubbish. We may still need faith for that, but we need a lot less than is needed to believe in god- such a small amount of faith is needed for it, that most people don't bother to take it into account at all... unless they're being a bit pedantic.
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
One can either be alive or dead, not both. I read up a little on this and it seems silly to me. Either the cat drank the poison and died, or it didn't and it lived. Actually, if the box was truly protected from all quantum discoherence it would need to be air tight, therefore the cat would suffocate and die regardless.
|
|
|
TheOtherHorseman
Where shall wisdom be found?
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from TheLastMagister at 7:01 pm on July 19, 2008
The theory is if you put a cat in a box, then put poison in a vial in the box, seal it, then use a change of pressure in the box to break the vial, you are therefore assuming that A) The cat is in the box B) The vial is in the box C) The poison is in the box D) The pressure broke the vial E) The cat has been killed by the poison And assuming is faith. Therefore you have put faith into five different things already that you cannot see, hear, touch, smell, feel, or in any way acknowledge their existence. 
Is that supposed to be the Schroedinger's Cat situation?
------- "My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
|
|
|
Event Horizon
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from TheLastMagister at 4:01 pm on July 19, 2008
The theory is if you put a cat in a box, then put poison in a vial in the box, seal it, then use a change of pressure in the box to break the vial, you are therefore assuming that A) The cat is in the box B) The vial is in the box C) The poison is in the box D) The pressure broke the vial E) The cat has been killed by the poison And assuming is faith. Therefore you have put faith into five different things already that you cannot see, hear, touch, smell, feel, or in any way acknowledge their existence. 
Lets do the same thing, we will line up 10,000 clear boxes of the same material and built exactly the same in the same factory. We will put a cat in each box. We will make enough poison to kill all 10,000 cats. If we put the vile in the box with the cat and seal it up, then change the pressures, one by one, we will see that in each and every single box the cat dies. all the way up through 9,999 boxes, they ALL die in 30 seconds +- a few seconds. The last box we cover up with black wrap, so that we can not see or hear anything inside the box. We change the pressure and after ~30 seconds we assume that the cat is dead. Shrodinger's theory is that the vile both broke and did not break, and the cat is both dead and not dead. Else, it is nothing until it is observed. I disagree. If all 9,999 cats die within 30 seconds, then it is safe to assume that the last cat will be dead too. That is not faith, that is reason. The vile breaks at a certain pressure the poison is potent enough to kill the cat 5 times over those are not subjective things, those are FACTS.
------- Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful.It's the transition that's troublesome. --Isaac Asimov
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|